The News Desk
|
Creationism'
biologist quits job
|
|
Professor
Michael Reiss has quit as director of education at the Royal Society
following the controversy over his recent comments on
creationism.
Last week
Prof Reiss - a Church of England minister - said creationism should be
discussed in science lessons if pupils raised the issue.
He was criticised by other scientists - though misquoted as
saying creationism should be "taught" in science classes.
The society
said some of his comments had been "open to misinterpretation".
This had
damaged its reputation. 'Not
scientific'
"As a
result, Professor Reiss and the Royal Society have agreed that, in the
best interests of the society, he will step down immediately as director
of education - a part-time post he held on secondment," it said in a statement.
"He is to
return, full time, to his position as professor of science education at
the The Royal
Society reiterated that its position was that creationism had no
scientific basis and should not be part of the science curriculum.
"However, if
a young person raises creationism in a science class, teachers should be
in a position to explain why evolution is a sound scientific theory and
why creationism is not, in any way, scientific."
It
added that the society greatly appreciated the efforts of Prof Reiss, a
biologist, in furthering its work in the important field of science
education over the past two years and wished him well for the future.
Creationists
take a literal interpretation of the Bible's description of the origin of
life and reject the Darwinian concept of evolution. Prof Reiss,
speaking at the British Association Festival of Science at the He said his
experience had led him to believe it was more effective to include
discussion about creationism alongside scientific theories such as the Big
Bang and evolution - rather than simply giving the impression that such
children were wrong. Misconceptions
Reacting to
his stepping down, Lord Robert Winston, professor of science and society
at Imperial College London, said: "I fear that in this action the Royal
Society may have only diminished itself. "This is not
a good day for the reputation of science or scientists.
"This
individual was arguing that we should engage with and address public
misconceptions about science - something that the Royal Society should
applaud." Roland
Jackson, chief executive of the British Association for the Advancement of
Science, said Mr Reiss's departure was a "real
loss". "I was at
the actual discussion and what I heard him say ,
however it has been reported, was essentially the position advocated by
the Royal Society," he said. Mr Jackson
said the organisation "should have supported him
and used this opportunity to further a reasoned debate".
Professor
Chris Higgins, vice-chancellor of the
|