|
The UK Bible Students Website Christian Biblical Studies
|
NATURAL RELATIONS
Part I
All Scripture references
are to the New International Version, UK edition unless stated otherwise.
For this reason a man
will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,
and they will become one
flesh.
Genesis 2: 24
THE ART COLLECTOR, Edward Perry Warren, was born in 1860, Boston,
Massachusetts. Leaving behind the country of his birth, he adopted England as
his home, dying in London in 1928. A connoisseur of antiquities, Warren
travelled Europe in search of pictures, fine art and china. Among his
collection was a silver cup, reckoned to date from A.D. 15, and now held by the
British Museum. The cup was put on public display in the museum from May to
July, 2006, coinciding with the events of Europride London. The cup formed the
centre piece of an exhibition titled ‘Sex and Society in Ancient Greece and
Rome.’
The British Museum’s choice of
subject and timing says as much about sex and society in modern Britain, as it
does about the Greeks and Romans. The silver cup portrays explicit erotic
scenes of male lovers. Because of the nature of the images the cup was never on
public display in Warren’s day, and in 1953 it was refused entry to the United
States for the same reason. Only recently has the British Museum judged that an
open display of the cup would meet with little disapproval.
This modern frankness has the
advantage of opening up a once-taboo subject for discussion and letting in
sunlight on the darkness. The figures of men and young boys on the Warren Cup
represent the classical Greek stereotypes of erastes and eromenos,
one the older man who is active, the other a boy, younger and passive. In some
ancient Greek literature this relationship was deemed fitting between teachers
and students, though today it would be called pederasty. The Warren Cup is a
fitting touchstone for the modern controversy over homosexuality, for though
some view the scenes of erastes and eromenos as acts of love,
others view them as acts of lust, a corruption of trust and an abuse of
innocence.
The ancient Greek view of
homosexuality is a world away from our modern understanding. Beguiled by art,
philosophy and a pantheon of gods, the Greek mind conflated a love for beauty
with sexual desire. It was customary to attribute these powerful emotions to
supernatural intervention. In Greek tradition the goddess Aphrodite is credited
as the instigator of sexual attraction, so the waywardness of a man’s desires
could be excused as beyond his control. Modern usage of the word aphrodisia
derives from the Greek word for sexual desire, which also has its roots in the
spell worked by Aphrodite on her subjects. There was no word for homosexual in
ancient Greece, and a man was expected to marry and have children even though
he might feel a strong sexual attraction to other men.
Gender Orientation in the Brain
Since the sexual revolution of the
1960’s, groups like Stonewall and the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT)
movement have given men and women of diverse ‘sexual orientation’ a platform to
express and defend their identity. The public work of these groups, as well as
several scientific studies, has largely contributed to a wider understanding of
homosexuality.
In 2008 the Swedish Karolinska
Institute published a report on the brain structure of self-assessed hetero-
and homo-sexual men and women. Using magnetic resonance imaging, a study of 90
subjects revealed that the homosexual men and heterosexual women in the study
had brains whose right and left hemispheres were of equal proportion, while
heterosexual men and homosexual women had a larger right hemisphere.
The same pairs also shared another
feature. In the group under analysis, the homosexual men and heterosexual women
possessed a wider spread of nerve connections in their left amygdala, a neural
hub of emotional sensations; while heterosexual men and homosexual women had
the greater spread in their right amygdala. These atypical brain structures of
the homosexual subjects are regarded as strong evidence that their gender
orientation was fixed at birth, not a development during adolescence, and not a
choice.[fn1]
Division in the Church
This hard fact has helped make
homosexuality a divisive issue among Christians – if sexuality is not a choice,
why is it discriminated against? Dr. Jeffrey John, Dean of St. Albans is a case
in point. John has been passed over for two clerical appointments because of
his homosexuality. A life of celibacy has not won over conservatives within the
Church of England to support his election to bishop. It is feared that his
appointment would rupture the already fragile Anglican communion.[fn2]
Christianity for All
Those who might support cases like
that of Dr. John refer to the universal offer of salvation made in the New
Testament. That homosexuality alone is no disqualification from a saving faith
in Jesus is clear from the many Scriptures which teach of the comprehensive
redemption available to all who recognise Christ as their Saviour and King
(Romans 10: 9-13):
[I]f
you confess with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that
God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For
it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your
mouth that you confess and are saved. As the
Scripture says, ‘Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame.’ For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—
the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, for, ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will
be saved.’
Justification by Faith
In these verses Paul lays down the
corner-stone of Christianity – justification by faith. There is no
qualification here as to the nature of the one exercising faith. Though God’s
favour was once limited to His chosen nation Israel, with the opening of the
Christian era came the invitation to the Gentiles, or all nations, to become
members of the new spiritual Israel. The exercise of a simple and sincere trust
in God’s promises was sufficient to effect a cancellation of sins and return
the believer to friendship with God. Past character was no bar to God’s
election, as Paul further explained to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 6: 9-11; italics
ours):
Do you
not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes
nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor
slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what
some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were
justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
Deeds Justify Faith
Paul reproves the church at
Corinth, citing a list of wrongs, of which some were once guilty. But
though such offences are no obstacle to God’s grace, Paul’s exhortation goes
beyond the faith that justifies and reminds the previously immoral that they
are now washed – they are from their conversion on to have characters and lives
free from the previous weaknesses of the flesh. For while faith may be reckoned
by God as righteousness, there is a further commandment to demonstrate one’s
faith by works (James 2: 14-16):
What
good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can
such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily
food. If one of you says to him, ‘Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed,’
but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it?
Deeds are the fruit of a living
faith, evidence that the word of God has taken root in the heart and the
affections and desires are being changed. Paul likens this struggle of the new Christ
mind for ascendancy over the old nature to a fight (1 Corinthians 9: 27, King
James Version):
But I
keep under [subdue, Ed.] my body, and bring it into subjection: lest
that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a
castaway.
Mastery of the Body
God may invite any, and the means
of redemption is available to all, but to overcome requires effort – success
carries with it certain conditions. Whatever habits or modes of conduct one
used to prefer or wanted before committing oneself to a Christian life,
the former ways must be abandoned in order for the Divine likeness to take hold
(Ephesians 4: 22-24):
You
were taught, with regard to your former way of life, to put off your old self,
which is being corrupted by its deceitful desires; to be made new in the
attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God in
true righteousness and holiness.
The Christian warfare is not easy;
it requires patience, perseverance, and self-denial. There is little doubt that
to profess Christ means to live godly, and no matter what ‘type’ of sexuality
one may possess when called, its expression is, like all human characteristics,
subject to the righteous will of God as soon as the vow of consecration is
made.
The belief by many that sexual
union between men of the same sex is approved by God is starkly contradicted
both by reason and Scripture. For as God designed those hidden parts of men and
women which in all creeds and nations provide opposite sexes with a universal
connection, like nuts and bolts, the new sexual mechanics of an alternative
fitting, is as St. Paul puts it “against nature” and, therefore, against
nature’s God (Romans 1: 26, 27, KJV).
To Be Continued
________________
NOTES
Citations to Web pages are correct as of the
dates retrieved, but sites may expire or be moved.
[fn1]
The Karolinska Institute is a medical university based in
Stockholm Sweden. Though the sample size of 90 is too small to draw universal
conclusions about the origins of sexuality, the results have been heralded as
significant evidence that, for some at least, gender orientation may not be a
choice. An abstract of the published paper is available here:
http://ki.se/ki/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=130&a=58064&l=en&newsdep=130 (retrieved 9 June
2011). Compare with this interpretation of the earlier research into
pheremones:
<http://narth.com/2010/09/latest-gay-brain-study-scrutinized/> (retrieved 9
June 2011).
[fn2] The Very Reverend Dr. Jeffrey John currently holds the post
of Dean of St. Albans. He was forced to stand down as a nominee for the office
of Bishop of Reading in 2003, on the grounds of his homosexuality. He is still
immersed in controversy. A contemporary account of the troubles in the Church
of England is reported here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/7870158/Gay-cleric-in-line-to-become-bishop-in-Church-of-England.html (retrieved 9 June 2011).
↑
_______________
Article copyright June 2011 by
ukbiblestudents.co.uk
You are free to reproduce any or all of this material, but please let us know if you do.
↑